Multivessel TALENT Trial – Supraflex Cruz vs Synergy DES in Triple Vessel Coronary Artery Disease

Multivessel Trial Results

Primary endpoint of MVT trial (non-inferiority)

POCE with periprocedural MI (SCAI approach)

EndpointSupraflex Cruz
N = 774, n(%)
SYNERGY
N = 774, n(%)
Risk Difference, %
(one-sided 95%CI)
P-value
non-inferiority
POCE with non-inferiority margin of 40% of the assumed event rate (10.7%)117(15.3%)111(14.6%)0.73 % (NA to 3.73)0.026
POCE with non-inferiority margin of 40% of the observed event rate (14.6%)117(15.3%)111(14.6%)0.73 % (NA to 3.73)<0.001

POCE with different definition of periprocedural MI (sensitivity-analysis)

POCE at 1 year with different definition of periprocedural MISupraflex Cruz
N = 774, n(%)
SYNERGY
N = 774, n(%)
Risk Difference, %
(95%CI)
P-value
periprocedural MI = NOBLE170 (9.2%)73 (9.7%)-0.46 (-3.40 to 2.49)0.763
periprocedural MI = SYNTAX277 (10.1%)75 (9.9%)0.19 (-2.83 to 3.22)0.899
periprocedural MI = 4th universal definition3166 (21.7%)169 (22.1%)-0.45 (-4.60 to 3.69)0.831
  1. N Engl J Med. 2016 Dec 8;375(23):2223-2235. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1610227.
  2. N Engl J Med. 2009 Mar 5;360(10):961-72. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0804626.
  3. Circulation. 2018 Nov 13;138(20):e618-e651. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000617.

POCE without periprocedural MI as used in the NOBLE trial

PPMI: SYNTAX I definition as used in the SYNTAX II trial

CK-MB ≥5 ULN and New Q waves

PPMI: 4th universal definition

5 ULN and at least one of:

  • New Q waves or
  • New ischemic ECG change or
  • Imaging wall motion abnormality or
  • Angiographic findings (loss side branch)
EndpointSupraflex Cruz
N = 774, n (%)
SYNERGY
N = 774, n (%)
Risk Difference, %
(two-sided 95% CIs)
P-value
POCE (all-cause death, any stroke, any MI, any revascularization)117 (15.3%)111 (14.6%)0.73 % (-2.86 to 4.31)0.691
All-cause death24 (3.2%)22 (2.9%)0.24 % (-1.49 to 1.96)0.787
Any stroke1 (0.1%)3 (0.4%)-0.27 % (-0.79 to 0.25)0.316
All-cause death and Stroke24 (3.2%)24 (3.2%)-0.03 % (-1.79 to 1.73)0.977
Any Myocardial infarction (MI)77 (10.1%)62 (8.2%)1.94 % (-0.96 to 4.84)0.190
All-cause death, any Stroke and any MI92 (12.0%)82 (10.8%)1.26 % (-1.93 to 4.45)0.439
Any revascularization48 (6.5%)51 (6.9%)-0.42 % (-2.96 to 2.12)0.745
BARC 2,3, or 5 bleeding49 (6.5%)49 (6.5%)0.04 % (-2.44 to 2.52)0.977
BARC 3 or 5 bleeding22 (2.9%)34 (4.5%)-1.57 % (-3.47 to 0.32)0.104
NACE (all-cause death, any stroke, any MI, any revascularization and BARC bleeding 3/5)119 (15.6%)113 (14.8%)0.72 % (-2.88 to 4.32)0.695

Conclusion

  • The screening was based on visual assessment of stenotic lesions (DS ≥50%) by the investigators, but many of the so-called 3VD, when investigated by physiology (QFR), were in fact 1- or 2VD, and only 35% were true 3VD from a functional point of view as in the SYNTAX-II trial* (37%, with combined iFR and FFR)

  • In 3VD patients treated with “State of the Art” PCI, the Supraflex Cruz is non-inferior to the SYNERGY in terms of PoCE at 1-year.

  • PPMI with its various definitions (Noble, SCAI, SYNTAX I, ARC-II, 4th UDMI) is a confounding factor. When removed from the composite endpoint (Noble approach), the rate of PoCE in the Supraflex Cruz (9.2%) and SYNERGY (9.7%) underscores the safety of performing 3VD PCI in patients with SYNTAX Score ranging from less than 22 to more than 32.

* Eur Heart J. 2017 Nov 7;38(42):3124-3134. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx512.

Additional Information

Baseline Characteristics

CharacteristicsSupraflex Cruz
N = 774
SYNERGY
N = 774
Age (years)68.267.9
Male74.9 %77.5 %
Body-mass index (kg/m2)28.328.4
Hypertension79.2 %79.7 %
Hyperlipidemia or Hyperlipidemia treatment74.5 %80.4 %
Diabetes36.0 %35.1 %
- Insulin Dependent10.7 %9.7 %
Family History of Coronary Artery Disease27.0 %30.2 %
Current Smoker20.5 %19.6 %
High bleeding risk (ARC-HBR)18.5 %18.7 %
Creatinine Clearance ≤ 60 ml/min18.7 %18.7 %
Heart Failure19.3 %17.3 %
Peripheral Vascular Disease10.5 %10.2 %
Atrial Fibrillation9.0 %9.8 %
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease7.0 %7.5 %
Previous Myocardial Infarction4.3 %4.1 %
Chronic Coronary Syndrome (CCS)48.8 %47.8 %
NSTE-ACS (based on biomarkers)51.2 %52.2 %
- NSTEMI38.1 %41.2 %
- Unstable angina13.0 %11.0 %
Reduced LVEF (<50%)19.3 %19.1 %
Use of long-term oral anticoagulation7.9 %8.3 %
Presence of CTO (per patient)26.0 %25.2 %
Presence of Bifurcation Lesion (per patient)73.0 %74.2 %
Anatomical SYNTAX Score (core lab report)20.0 (14.0-26.0)20.0 (15.0-27.0)
Functional SYNTAX Score (core lab report)19.0 (13.0-25.5)18.5 (13.0-26.0)
Predicted 1-year mortality* (Logistic clinical SYNTAX)3.3 % (3.1-3.6)3.3 % (3.1-3.6)

*  Eur Heart J. 2012 Dec;33(24):3098-104. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs295.

Abbreviation: CK-MB: Creatine Kinase–Myocardial Band, ULN: Upper Limit of Normal, NACE: Net Adverse Clinical Events, iFR: Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio, FFR: Fractional Flow Reserve, QFR: Quantitative Flow Ratio, UDMI: Universal, Definition of Myocardial Infarction, PPMI: Periprocedural Myocardial Infarction, NSTE-ACS: Non–ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome, NSTEMI: Non–ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction, CTO: Chronic Total Occlusion

Scroll to Top